http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/03/osama-bin-laden-unarmed-during-raid_n_857257.html
Why did the heli crash ?
With officials at the CIA and the White House watching on television monitors, tensions increased when one of the two Black Hawk helicopters lowered into the compound and, beneath a moonless sky, fell heavily to the ground. Officials believe that was due to higher-than-expected air temperature that interfered with the chopper's ability to hover – an aeronautical condition known as "hot and high."
So what exactly is "hot and high" ?
Quote from: anwar on May 04, 2011, 12:23:05 PM
So what exactly is "hot and high" ?
probably air pressure reduces and hence heli comes down. Just wondering how does real helis move up and down? pitch variations or rpm variations.
Quote from: anwar on May 04, 2011, 12:23:05 PM
So what exactly is "hot and high" ?
Anwar bhai, this is reported by a news channel, please dont expect anything from them that they understand aeronotics....most of the times when they dont have an appropriate word to explan a situation they invent ;D.....it......
There you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_and_high
Don't care about the term itself. What exactly happened aeronautically, was the point/question.
well some news reports say that noting happened ...there was a technical failure so ...and Heli could'nt took off hence just to avoid its miss use, they burnt it. :headscratch:.....
If I am not mistaken, a F 16 of the Thunderbirds Team had crashed while completing a loop. There are some graphic videos of this event. Here is a link:
http://www.f-16.net/news_article968.html
Though I am not sure if this crash has anything to do with 'hot and high', would request Gusty to comment on this.
Quote from: anwar on May 04, 2011, 12:39:45 PM
Don't care about the term itself. What exactly happened aeronautically, was the point/question.
"Air density decreases with increasing temperature and altitude. Lower air density reduces the amount of lift generated by the wings of an airplane or the rotors of a helicopter, which may hamper an aircraft's performance, or in some cases, prevent it from becoming airborne at all."
That should answer it.
Interesting notes about the heli itself.
http://cencio4.wordpress.com/2011/05/03/mysterious-helicopter/
http://www.aviationweek.com (http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a275902dd-e7a2-40fd-ab78-d46e3bf922b1&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest)
It is a stealthy variety... that is why it was destroyed :headscratch:
Judging by how the tail landed on the wall, seems like a pretty nasty crash. Wonder how the commandos/seals were affected, or was this after they had roped out, and only the pilot was inside when it went down.
These helies have been falling in Afghanistan like dead leaf because of the same reason. They have even made some modification to fix this but it has not proved helpful.
{:)} {:)}...good one, really appreciate that knowledge piece.
here it is
http://www.rcindia.org/rc-general-topics/basic-aerodynamics-for-rc-flying/msg60603/#msg60603
Better pictures of the crashed heli here :
http://www.reuters.com/subjects/bin-laden-compound
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/04/us-binladen-pakistan-photos-idUSTRE7437KK20110504
Also says the helicopter is previously unknown and "stealthy".
Quote from: anwar on May 05, 2011, 05:33:28 PM
Better pictures of the crashed heli here
:o now way.. thats not a black hawk
Found this, its in Russian but looks they are getting somewhere with this:
http://www.avsimrus.com/forum/topic/116416-padenie-vertolyota-2-maya-2011-v-pakistane/
http://english.aljazeera.net/video/americas/2011/05/20115515014654164.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/US/05/06/bin.laden.helicopter/index.html?hpt=T2
Interesting article... towards the last part. Are helis fragile in general ?
http://translogic.aolautos.com/2011/05/10/bin-laden-caught-but-another-black-hawk-down-on-critical-missio/
Quote from: anwar on May 11, 2011, 10:48:11 PM
Are helis fragile in general ?
I would think so.Since weight is a limitation,they can't be heavily armored(especially attack helicopters) and the heavily armored ones are slow.Not exactly ideal for insertion and extraction missions.
I would like to see Augustine sir's point on this.
Of-course they are fragile, try throwing a small stone on your friends heli when its revving up ;D
Quote from: iamahuman on May 11, 2011, 11:10:59 PM
I would think so.Since weight is a limitation,they can't be heavily armored(especially attack helicopters) and the heavily armored ones are slow.Not exactly ideal for insertion and extraction missions.
I was trying to point out the "large number of moving parts" aspect. Applies to RC helis too... and I have seen many people give up heli flying, some after one session, and others after years :)
But any reason why it hasn't been simplified?Or is it as simple as it gets?
Quote"large number of moving parts" aspect.Applies to RC helis too... and I have seen many people give up heli flying, some after one session, and others after years
Well, that is one reason I stick on to heli flying alone. The challenges are more :)