With almost every cellphone having a cam today, a detailed photo of such items, highlighting any existing damage/nick is a good practice. See the Buy Sell forum on RCuniverse/Rcgroups.

I would be better if make this rule as an imperitive for our Buy Sell section. If personal inspection is not feasible (though I consider it a buyer's right), a potential buyer deserves photos.

No pics - No sale.

Our admin not willing to agree for some reasons 

http://www.rcindia.org/for-sale/guidelines-for-classifieds/   (item 2) !

Threads sud be blocked w/o genuine photos!

C'mmon Vinay, we don't have an ordinary mod here on this forum!! See!!

Anwar, Your Rule #2 is perfect, and we just need it  made a requirement instead of 'Best Practice'.  Where ever there is a need for exception (like selling Software/Gift Coupon etc) , the seller may put in foot note so that. Else such possible troublesome sales should be blocked for betterment of new comers (and I bet large no of casual college kids fall prey).

Another way to do things :

Appoint two or three people in various locations in India ( preferabbly forum member with decent credibility... Let the seller ship the item for sale to the appointed person at the closest location from the buyer ... also the buyer will transfer /send the money to the appointed person... The appointed person will do quality check of the item and also ensure that the money is recieved post which he will transfer the goods to the buyer and the money to the seller....

I know this demands alot but for sure is a fool proof method

Why don't we instead keep membership forms which is genuine
1.  Submit Documents to Some Appointed members ..
2.  Documents Submitted should be attested by Gazetted Officers
3.  Documents should include Photo Graph , Valid id proof and Address Proof (like the Passport copy Etc)
4. Members should be allowed to put sale items only after some required number of posts (eg 100)
   This may involve more work but if the work is divided it might be easy
moreover this method (above 3) is used to procure digital signature (class 3)
regards
Rajaram

Sounds excellent Rajaram.... I am sure this way we wont have notorious people joining in and spoiling the fun.

Good way, but too much work for "once in a year" issues.

Its kind of like goverment ways to verify identity but sounds solid...its practice might still be a question....Anyways great suggestion Mr. Rajaram

None of this is needed   No other forum in the world works that way, YET they all work.  It only takes good feedback mechanism, and a strong will by anyone affected to drag the offending party to courts/police (especially with a "cyber" charge), and everyone will be back to their natural senses !

Anwar, what is RCI doing with the current offender after having all the facts upfront, are we banning him from the site, since the event has taken place on RCI I think the governing body should initiate some sort of action......

All,

I have initiated a formal compaint (cyber law case) ... and will be posting the events as and when they happen ....

Quote from: ujjwaana on January 21, 2011, 04:03:54 PM
Anwar, Your Rule #2 is perfect, and we just need it  made a requirement instead of 'Best Practice'.

I want the forum to be as welcoming as possible. At the same time I want it to be clean. Most people will post pictures, because they know that is what they would want for themselves !  It is about being in the other person's shoes.  Let us not be uptight on these issues, I have a fair bit of faith in "everything happens for the better"

Anwar, what is RCI doing with the current offender after having all the facts upfront, are we banning him from the site, since the event has taken place on RCI I think the governing body should initiate some sort of action......

Quote from: divay99 on January 21, 2011, 05:52:03 PM
Anwar, what is RCI doing with the current offender after having all the facts upfront, are we banning him from the site, since the event has taken place on RCI I think the governing body should initiate some sort of action......

Anwar thinks that banning a user from this forum is of no use since he/she can join with another email and username.

Quote from: stunningstar on January 21, 2011, 06:13:40 PM
Anwar thinks that banning a user from this forum is of no use since he/she can join with another email and username.

Man. You do have guts .

Anwar, Can we not track this guy from his IP ? We have his bank account number and i think can be used to trace and nail this guy. He just somehow deserves to be thrashed.

welcome to the forum once again stunningstar .... your knowledge of Anwar's thinking is quite credible ....

If by any chance stunningstar you do happen to visit Delhi, please do pay me a visit, you do have my address.... after all you sent me the envelope....
I would love to meet you in person

He has gone through the other trade dispute threads here   Doing one's homework is the mark of a pro !

Plus it is good for him to be on the forum with the same identity, it leaves more digital footprints to trace    

Creating a new Gmail account is super easy !

You seem to be suporting him Anwar....I smell fish

what!!!!!

Why would Anwar sir be supporting him?

I have said all that needs to be said   And done pretty much all that needs to be done !

Still waiting for your answer Anwar, Or should I consider the answer from stunningstar as the final verdict

"Anwar, what is RCI doing with the current offender after having all the facts upfront, are we banning him from the site, since the event has taken place on RCI I think the governing body should initiate some sort of action...... "

Divay - There is no point in banning accounts. The technical reasons for which I have clarified before.  And I have even mentioned why the status quo might be beneficial to you.  In fact, you should have PMed me the above post.

I am little disappointed at how such obvious aspects did not register !