Kangaroo crash and fire

Started by anwar, January 24, 2011, 08:11:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

anwar

What happened Lavneet ? :o  Radio issues ?

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.

ved

Turnigy 9x w. Er9x | Custom Hovercraft |Scratch Build Boat | Tricopter | Skysurfer V3|

CrazyPilot

what was the damage in terms of  :Rs:?
When you fly electric, fly clean, fly quiet, and fly safe!

lavneetgyani

yup....radio failure. Went into fail safe!!

anwar

What radio system was it ?  Was it a receiver power pack issue ?

Sad to see this :(
Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.

lavneetgyani

14MZ, can never tell real reason. Everything was charred...

Ajay JM

Awaiting the next tornado to fly my kites..

sharlock

#7
I am quite sure is a case of a 2.4 radio lock out... Just need to know how many people were flying at the time of the crash? At Joe Nall back in 2008 there were similar issues of 2.4 lock outs so now to avoid this in 2009 they came up with a new rule that you cannot turn your radio on until you are ready to fly there are 100's of pilots flying on 2.4 & if all the radios are turned on there is a possibility of a some radios might get lockout. For some people 2.4 is still scary.. so they prefer 72 Mhz

rohitgupta322

Wow this is incredible. Truly unbelievable.
Be Inquisitive

anwar

Quote from: sharlock on January 25, 2011, 11:44:48 AM
I am quite sure is a case of a 2.4 radio lock out...

Haha, standard reaction/blame :)  The issue is most likely receiver power, which can be as subtle as a bad switch or stale soldering.

Quote from: sharlock on January 25, 2011, 11:44:48 AM
For some people 2.4 is still scary.. so they prefer 72 Mhz
72Mhz is any day riskier than 2.4Ghz, especially in crowded fields !  Cases like Joe Nall are unique environments, which would NEVER happen in regular flying fields where you will not find more than 10 or 15 people flying at the same time.
Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.

SunLikeStar

Quote from: sharlock on January 25, 2011, 11:44:48 AM
For some people 2.4 is still scary.. so they prefer 72 Mhz
Like me, I just cant trust that system enough! An now that everyone is going Googoo hertz, i have all channels for the taking :)

anwar

Of course, my brother still flies on 72Mhz, and he is one of the two people left in the field who fly Mhz !
Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.

tg

This could have caused a much bigger issue had the fire got too big to put out. But dramatic video indeed!!

sharlock


Quote from: sharlock on January 25, 2011, 11:44:48 AM
I am quite sure is a case of a 2.4 radio lock out...

Haha, standard reaction/blame :)  The issue is most likely receiver power, which can be as subtle as a bad switch or stale soldering.

Quote from: sharlock on January 25, 2011, 11:44:48 AM
For some people 2.4 is still scary.. so they prefer 72 Mhz

No way this crash is due to a switch problem or a dry soldering 80% i would go with excess receiver heat which caused the lockout..

medicineman1987

Woah! In my head i'm thinking hmm.. he's turning left now.. N WHAM! N thats quite a big fire.. How did the camera survived?
"The day you stop playing with your toys is the day you start getting ready to die.."

FlySky 9x (with ER9x,  backlight mod &  dual module hack) | Futaba SkySport 4VF (with 5th channel hack) | Glidiator - scratchbuilt 60" electric glider | SkySurfer | Scratchbuilt Tricopter | FT Nutball |  .46 Glow trainer (electric conversion in progress)

asinghatiya

Ohh You think in Head  :o....joking...I think camera didnt survived and it was a wireless camera with its recording at ground.
:-)